The Theological Vs Scientific Realms of Knowledge | Complete Free Essay with Outline

Spread the love
  • 24
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    25
    Shares

Last Updated on

OUTLINE

  1. Religion Vs Science
  2. The Theological Realm of Knowledge
    • A Godly System
    • Opposite to Scientific Developments
    • Theological and Discursive Reason
  3. The Scientific Realm of Knowledge
    • Based on Human Reason
    • Self-Corrective and Evolving
    • Inductive Experimentation
  4. Theological Realm Prefers Stability Over Change
    • Uses Theological Criteria to Judge Science
  5. Scientific Realm Always Looks for Change
    • Uses Experimental Approach to Judge Religion or Spirituality
  6. Both Religion and Science Need to be Treated Differently
    • They Require Different Says of Establishing and Judging
    • Do not Downgrade Either and Acknowledge their Unique Contribution
    • What Science does can be Seen and Observed but the Transformation Brought About by Religion in the Inner Core of People is Invisible
  7. Conclusion

The debate about religion and science dates back centuries. The debate is not about a technical matter, but about two realms of knowledge — theological and scientific. There seems to be an epistemological clash of validity between the two, apparently with each claiming sway over human life.

Faith leaders or ulema, in general, boast of having a godly system, which is eternally true, free from error and change. They underplay the hand of man in the understanding, interpretation and application of religious dogmas.

Religious leaders are known to oppose scientific developments that they interpret as opposing the key notions of religion due largely to the fear that these would undermine the faith of believers. They may do it with sincerity to religion, and presumably, to save believers from error.

Their tools to deny science are theological and based largely on discursive reason, and not necessarily empirical evidence. They do not always have at their disposal the modern tools of understanding religion, such as the scientific history of religions, sociology, psychology, anthropology etc. Reza Aslan’s work God: a Human History is illuminating; it explores how the evolution of religious impulses has taken place in the history of humankind.

SEE ALSO: Religion in Nation Building | Complete Essay with Outline

Scientists, on the other hand, see science as a realm of knowledge strongly reliable, based on human reason and demonstrable empirical evidence. For them, it is a self-corrective and evolving project, modifying itself, and following new evidence through inductive experimentation. It is an approach to generating and judging knowledge.

A religious mindset, on the other hand, sees this changing nature of scientific discoveries as a weakness, boasting of perennial and unchanging ‘truths’. It prefers stability over change; it is dogma-based.

In almost all religions, historically opposition to science and scientists has been proverbial, leading to prejudices against, and torture of, scientists, as they are seen as ‘perverted’ souls, hell-bent on defying religious dogmas. This happens often because they use theological criteria to judge science; it is exactly like scientists judging religion or spirituality based on their experimental approach.

The debate between religion and science, put simply, leaves us with no common ground. I, for one, argue that the epistemological approaches (forms of knowing and their validity criteria) to both religion and science need to be treated differently as they require different ways of establishing (methodology) and judging (criteria of truth) knowledge and truth claims.

We need to be sophisticated enough to see these differences so that we understand each through its own perspective, avoiding one criterion for judging both.

Each branch of science requires different methodologies to study it. Similarly, within religion, each branch requires different methodologies of study such as law or spirituality, language or ritual.

Thus, when the ulema judge science using theology, they inevitably make the same mistake as those scientists who judge religion using the scientific method.

So, it is necessary that we treat both of them differently, which means we do not downgrade either of them but acknowledge the unique contribution of each to human welfare.

In my lectures and visits to international audiences, I am always asked by young people the fashionable question: ‘What contribution has religion made to human progress in the last 500 years?’ This is obviously done keeping the magnificent scientific contributions at the back of their mind. I argue, ‘What contributions could one expect from religion to make?’ Did we expect religion to make a technological revolution?

By nature, what science does can be seen and observed; but the transformation brought about by religion in the inner core of people is invisible.

However, though exceptional civilisational achievements might have been possible thanks to scientists, it is impossible to ignore the religious ‘faith’ impulse within, and the spiritual inspiration behind, for example, civilisational art and architectural marvels, and literary jewels.

It is unfair to expect religion to bring, say, a super technological revolution. The major purpose of religion is to not to make technological advances but to carry out ‘inner engineering’, and transformations, and make people virtuous.

In sum, let us avoid rejecting a scientific approach to solving human problems at the altar of religion; nor should we reject religion because it does not work as science.

Let us celebrate both as they address different dimensions of human yearning equally. As the Quran (2:201), says, “…Our Lord! Give us good in this world and good in the Hereafter. …”. So we seek the best of both religion and science. Let the ulema become a bridge between the two.

By Jan-e-Alam Khaki

The writer is an educationist with an interest in the study of religion and philosophy.

Via

The essays included here are from numerous sources or authors (sources mentioned in each essay). The most important question is ‘how to write an essay?’ The answer varies from person to person. Yet, the main purpose of Essaypspedia/Tech Urdu is to give you an idea of the essays. It is now up to you, being an aspirant of the competitive examinations, to edit/update/improve/add in it. You can also submit your essays at tulaib_javid@yahoo.com

Top #15 Essays Worth Your Time

  1. Top #5 Water Scarcity Issues in Pakistan Essays
  2. Education Reforms in Pakistan | Complete Essay with Outline
  3. Population Peril | Complete Essay with Outline
  4. Digital Revolution in Pakistan | Complete Essay with Outline
  5. Inflation in Pakistan – Its Effects & Drivers | Complete Essay with Outline
  6. The True Potential of Economic Corridors | Complete Essay
  7. Regional Risks for Doing Business – The Case of Pakistan | Complete Essay with Outline
  8. Climate Change – A Ticking Bomb | Complete Essay with Outline
  9. Impacts of Demographics on the Economy of the Country | Complete Essay with Outline
  10. Religion in Nation Building | Complete Essay with Outline
  11. Higher Education in Pakistan – Ills & Remedies | Complete Essay with Outline
  12. The Crises of Urban Housing | Complete Essay with Outline
  13. The Five Pillars of The Political Structure | Complete Essay (850 Words)
  14. Environmental Governance – The Case of Pakistan | Complete Essay with Outline
  15. Top#5 Essays on Social/Society Issues Related Matters

Spread the love
  • 24
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    25
    Shares

Naeem Javid

Naeem Javid Muhammad Hassani is working as Deputy Conservator of Forests in Balochistan Forest & Wildlife Department (BFWD). He is the CEO of Tech Urdu (techurdu.net) Forestrypedia (forestrypedia.com), Majestic Pakistan (majesticpakistan.pk), Essayspedia, etc & their YouTube Channels). He is an Environmentalist, Blogger, YouTuber, Developer & Vlogger.

Please, Let us know what you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.